This is an outdated version published on 2024-05-07. Read the most recent version.

Comments on the decision of the BVerfG of 10 November 2023 (File reference number 1BvR 2036/23)

Inadmissible constitutional complaint by a press company against a confidentiality obligation imposed in civil proceedings

Authors

  • Prof Dr Thomas Hoeren University of Münster

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17879/zkr-2023-5434

Keywords:

Freedom of the press, protection of reputation, criminal law, sexual abuse

Abstract

Bild‐Zeitung filed a constitutional complaint against a confidentiality ruling at the Higher Regional Court of Cologne concerning reporting on a case of abuse. The OLG ruled partly in favour of Bild‐Zeitung, but imposed a confidentiality obligation on those present in the courtroom. The Federal Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible, emphasising that the freedom of the press must be weighed against the protection of confidentiality in court proceedings. Bild argued against the confidentiality obligation, but the decision suggests that the complaint was not sufficiently well‐founded. The court emphasised the need to balance freedom of the press and confidentiality in the interests of justice and privacy.

Author Biography

Prof Dr Thomas Hoeren, University of Münster

Thomas Hoeren (born 1961), is Professor of Information Law and Legal Informatics and Director of the Institute for Information, Telecommunications and Media Law (ITM) at the University of Münster.

Published

2024-05-07

Versions

Issue

Section

Comments on decisions