A fine line: Credibility rather than faith testing

Comment on the decision of the BVerfG of 3.4.2020 (Ref. 2 BvR 1838/15) on the question of when state courts may deny the identity character of an asylum seeker's conversion to Christianity.

Authors

  • Prof. Dr. Claus Dieter Classen University of Greifswald

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17879/zkr-2022-4605

Keywords:

Federal Constitutional Court, Asylum, Credibility, Religious affiliation

Abstract

The author comments on the decision of the Federal Constitutional Court of 03.04.2020. This decision deals with the credibility of converted asylum seekers and how to deal with them. In this context, the author comes to the conclusion that the Federal Constitutional Court wants both to call on the courts to be sensitive in dealing with the right to freedom of faith and to call on the churches to be cautious in their practice in dealing with requests for baptism. It goes on to answer the question of the extent to which the state can permissibly answer the question of religious affiliation

Author Biography

Prof. Dr. Claus Dieter Classen, University of Greifswald

Dieter Classen (born 1960) is professor of Public Law, European and International Law at the University of Greifswald; Judge at the Higher Administrative Court and member of the Constitutional Court of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern.

Published

2023-06-19
صندلی اداری سرور مجازی ایران Decentralized Exchange

Issue

Section

Comments on decisions
فروشگاه اینترنتی